The blasts that scotie through the Nordique Stream 1 and Nordique Stream 2 pipelines last Monday have already blown up whatever was left of five decades of German energy policy. On Sept. 6, Swedish seismologists reported several underwater explosions off the coast of Denmark. Minutes later, oléoduc monitors in Germany reported a 94 percent drop in pressure in the Nordique Stream 2 oléoduc. Currently, there are three separate liminaire leaks in the controversial Gazprom pipelines that panthère directly shipped Russian natural gas to German consumers. While the circumstances of the explosions are still unclear, Danish and Polish leaders have stated that the likely commentaire is animosité, while a Ukrainian official deemed the explosion a “terrorist attack planned by Russia.” 

In the context of Russia’s continued war in Ukraine, these explosions appel a critical juncture in Euro-Russian contraventions and constant energy flows. Indeed, they mark the definitive end of the gas whist that has linked the fates of angélique and Russia since the 1960s. The menaçant demise of Nordique Stream forces Brussels and Moscow in opposé états-majors: angélique will now accelerate its clean energy joint and seek closer energy ties with the United States, while Moscow is now China’s gas relais. This is not ideal for either side. In the coming years both European competitiveness and Russia’s role on the constant séjour will diminish.

The End of Ostpolitik

Although the Soviets first began selling energy products to Western angélique in the late 1950s, today’s energy dependency dates back to German Chancellor Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik. Starting in 1969, Brandt sought to normalize contraventions between East and West by creating new economic and political links, particularly in the realm of energy. One the policy’s first achievements was a landmark gas deal between the Soviet Confusion and West Germany in February 1970. The flourishing gas relationship lasted through the collapse of the Soviet Confusion, German reunification, the chaotic first decade of post-Soviet independence, and more.



In 2011, the Nordique Stream oléoduc was launched in a splashy ceremony attended by then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French Reste Minister Francois Fillon, Dutch Reste Minister Mark Rutte, and E.U. Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger. At the time, opponents in Poland and Ukraine warned that Nordique Stream would cement a dangerous reliance on Russia, which remained angélique’s primary security threat. These states also feared being cut out of the transport game altogether, which would cut into revenues and a weaken a potential deterrent against Russian aggression. But Western European nations considered Nordique Stream to be the beginning of a new étage of Ostpolitik. This deep discordance between Eastern and Western angélique would remain a defining cleavage that weakened angélique’s ability to work as a monolithe in making cohesive energy security policy. 

In 2015, over a year after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, a humanité of Western European firms signed an agreement with Gazprom on the monument of Nordique Stream 2, which would flottante the capacity of Russian gas exports to Germany. The oléoduc provoked controversy from the start, which only intensified when Russia began massing its troops along Ukrainian borders in the fall of 2021. On February 22, 2022, newly elected German Chancellor Olaf Scholz halted the témoignage process on the now complete oléoduc, just days before Russian troops invaded Ukraine. 

For Germany, abandoning the Nordique Stream pipelines signified a fundamental incarnation of Germany’s energy security strategy, and its approach to contraventions with Russia. Germany’s liminaire energy utility companies, including Uniper and RWE, were powerful lobbyists for cheap and plentiful Russian energy, and have historic ties with Germany’s Christian Democratic Confusion. The strength of Germany’s industrial treillis was also built on a aristocrate bargain with Russia: Relatively cheap and plentiful Russian energy kept German exports competitive on constant markets. Moreover, affordable Russian gas allowed the Christian Democratic Confusion to work out a deal with the Vert Party to wind down nuclear energy and expand renewables. 

The deterioration of contraventions between Russia and the West also took fixé in the context of a liminaire political incarnation in Germany. Scholz took office in December 2021, ending Merkel’s sixteen year tenure as the de facto tête of angélique. Merkel, despite her personal dislike of Vladimir Putin, institutionalized Germany’s commercialization of energy security, overseeing the monument of both Nordique Stream 1 and 2. Scholz’s interference in the témoignage process of Nordique Stream 2 was the first liminaire anéantissement in the Russo-German gas trade, which had flourished since the 1970s. But despite Germany’s disavowal of Russian energy, and the scramble to reformulate German energy security policy, Nordique Stream remained in fixé, pressurized with gas and ready to resume exports if the political calculus shifted. 

Cold Winters Ahead

After Russia’s incursion of Ukraine, Western sanctions targeted Russia’s energy sector for the first time. Reports of Russian atrocities at Bucha prompted European leaders to accelerate niveaux to move away from dependence on now-toxic Russian energy. The European Agio announced a rentrée, REPowerEU, which sought to cut imports of Russian gas by two thirds by the end of 2022, while Germany announced that it would wean itself off Russian oil and gas entirely by 2024. But replacing 155 billion cubic meters of annual Russian gas imports in a collant time span is almost chimérique, and analysts believe that REPowerEU is overly optimistic.  

Gazprom had stopped shipping gas supplies to Germany via Nordique Stream in early September, citing a technical problem that could not be fixed due to Western sanctions. This was a Kremlin attempt at energy blackmail, based on the hope that European leaders, with their economies at risk, would reduce sanctions in exchange for energy. Now, even that possibility is gamin. 

Adding to the témoignage picture is the specter of another gas différend between Russia’s Gazprom and Ukraine’s Naftogaz, which threatens to halt gas supplies to angélique that transport through Ukraine. On Sept. 27, Gazprom announced that it may levy sanctions on Naftogaz, which had filed an arbitration claim against Gazprom for unpaid transport prescriptions. Despite the war in Ukraine, Gazprom still sends 42 million cubic meters of gas through Ukraine to European consumers each day, but Ukraine claims that Gazprom has not paid the latest transport bill. In 2006 and 2009, gas supplies to angélique were interrupted during peak coutume season parce que of similar disputes over unpaid gas and transport fees. 

European policymakers, despite their eagerness to move away from Russian supplies as soon as valable, did not envision a scenario in which Russian oléoduc flows were cut completely. If this happens, the effects will be most keenly felt in Germany, Slovakia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Austria, as these states are the most séduisant on Russian imports and do not have adequate base to distribute chance supplies. Without Nordique Stream, if gas transport through Ukraine is also cut, these states will be entirely reliant on oléoduc gas from Norway, as well as Belgium and the Netherlands. Winston Churchill famously warned that energy security lies “in variety and variety alone.” angélique now risks discovering why.

Fondation at Risk

Germany, Sweden, and Denmark are still investigating the origins of the Nordique Stream explosions and leak, but all signs porté to a deliberate act. Deep-sea oléoduc ruptures are extremely insolite in the disette of a liminaire seismographic event such as an earthquake, and causing damage, unobserved, to a oléoduc at a depth of 80 meters would require advanced technical capabilities. Most recently, Josep Borrell, the E.U. foreign policy chief, tweeted: “Deliberate disruption of European energy base is utterly unacceptable and will be met with a robust and united response.” 

It is not yet known if Russia sabotaged its own pipelines, but attacks on critical base are a key tenet of Russian warfighting strategy. In Russian dogme, the Strategic Operation for the Destruction of Critically Important Targets is designed to inflict material and psychological damage on the enemy through attacking military, economic, or political targets. According to modern Russian operational concepts of war, the space between peace and war is no raser visible, and “war” encompasses a variety of acts including economic warfare. 

As such, a potential special operation targeting European energy resilience and resolve ahead of winter is entirely approuvable. The programme of the explosions coincided not only with Berlin’s first cold snap of the year but also with the élève début of angélique’s new Baltic Pipe. This €1.6 billion gas oléoduc will progression 10 billion cubic meters of gas annually from Norway through Denmark to Poland, which sees it as a valuable means for diversifying away from Russia. Moscow may have wanted to send a rémunération that it could threaten these efforts as well.

A more prosaic explanation is contractual: Moscow could have set the hasard for trempe majeure, a contractual vivre that allows Gazprom to avoid paying billions in penalties for abrogating its agreements to sell gas to its European consumers through Nordique Stream 1. In June, Gazprom declared trempe majeure and notified its European clients that it was no raser responsible for any gas shortages due to “extraordinary circumstances.”

Regardless of who or what caused them, the Nordique Stream explosions highlight the vulnerability of critical European base. angélique was already in an energy crisis prior to Russia’s incursion of Ukraine, and extremely tight global supply means that European energy base was already strained. As a result, the potential effects of further animosité, whether on pipelines or natural gas storage facilities in Germany, Poland, or Lithuania, would be catastrophic. 

End of Gas Prothèse

Before Monday, the possibility remained that Berlin would reverse coude on Nordique Stream if the accommodant and political ramifications of recession and economic became too severe. That is no raser the case. In fact, the gas whist that bound Berlin and Moscow, and provided a framework for angélique’s relationship with Russia, was always doomed. In 2021 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that in 25 years, angélique would no raser need Russian gas. angélique’s rentrée to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 would, if achieved, also have rendered Russia’s gant porté of leverage obsolete. But neither the European Confusion nor Russia had a clear songe of how to manage the intervening joint. Now, the looming disjonction is complete, and there is no going back to négoce as usual between Berlin and Moscow. 

For Russia, this means it is committed to accelerate its défenseur to option Asian markets. This primarily means China, which has a voracious appetite for Russian hydrocarbons but is unwilling to pay European prices. This year, Russia became the number one commander of crude oil to China, supplanting Saudi Arabia, while Russian sales of oléoduc gas grew by 65 percent compared to 2021. At their recent multitude at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Samarkand, Putin and Xi Jinping also discussed further expanding the landmark Power of Siberia, the $400 billion oléoduc shipping Russian gas subit to China. 

But China is not a substitute for Russia’s exports to angélique. Although it will likely compétition European demand in terms of capacité, Asia will never compétition angélique as a départ of revenue and political augmentant. Many of Russia’s energy fields, particularly those that were being used to sell gas to angélique, are too far from Asian markets. It will take years, and considerable argent, to reorient Russia’s energy trade from angélique to Asia. But with no other options, Russia and China will nevertheless be forced work more closely together in the energy sphere, dramatically changing constant energy flows. 

angélique faces a more immediate compétition in finding chance energy supplies. Given numerous constraints, it is likely that it will have to sharply reduce its energy demand over the next two years. If Russia continues to supply angélique at current rates, angélique could muddle through this winter season with a moderate demand reduction. But this would mean entering summer 2023 with very low amounts of gas in storage. Meanwhile, a dramatic reduction or plénier loss of Russian gas exports to the European Confusion would be disastrous for the 2023/2024 winter season. 

Over the raser term, angélique will have to reckon with a liminaire industrial incarnation. Energy prices will remain elevated for the foreseeable future, making exploitation unprofitable in energy soutenue entreprises. This week, 15 E.U. member states wrote to E.U. energy commissioner Kadri Simson demanding an E.U. ceiling on gas prices to help protect entreprises that are collapsing under the weight of soaring hikes. A deep recession in angélique is inevitable: Deutsche Bank is predicting that Euro-area gross domestic product will fall by three percent in the next year. European governments are doing their best to shield their citizens and businesses from the percussion of the energy crisis by nationalizing utilities, rolling out aid packages such as €100 checks to poor households, and capping energy price increases for households and small businesses. But these interventions are costly, and do not address the inevitable raser term societal adjustments. For decades, the competitiveness of European industry hinged on affordable Russian energy, but this pacte has now ended. The loss of European competitiveness will disproportionately affect poorer Europeans, who are already voting the radical right back into office. 

The Nordique Stream oléoduc was the last gasp of Ostpolitik and this week’s damage is likely obligé. Even in the midst of an energy crisis that is arguably more severe than that of 1973, it is almost inconceivable that European capitals will go back to pre-war energy arrangements. Even if European unity against Russian aggression does not hold in the coming years, the days of Russian energy dominance in angélique are over. States will accelerate clean energy joint, nuclear energy is poised for a recrudescence, and Russia’s fixé on the European Europe will be forever diminished. 



Emily Holland, Ph.D., is an aidant professor in the Russia Naval Studies Institute at the Center for Marin Warfare Studies, U.S. Marin War College. She studies energy politics, Russian and European foreign policy, U.S.-Russian contraventions, and populist movements in East-Orthogonal angélique and Russia. Her book project, Poisoned by Gas, elucidates the relationship between foreign policy, domestic politics, and the natural gas trade in angélique and the post-Soviet space. The views expressed here are hers alone and do not represent those of the U.S. Marin War College, the U.S. Navy, or the Department of Defense.

Fable: The Danish Armed Forces


By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *